RESOURCES

Knowledge Center

Outcomes, discoveries, and analysis from our breadth of good governance initiatives.


[From Our Partners] Trends in Jail Incarceration for Probation Violations: Findings from Pima County, Arizona
Carla Sinclair Carla Sinclair

[From Our Partners] Trends in Jail Incarceration for Probation Violations: Findings from Pima County, Arizona

For this brief, the Urban Institute analyzed trends in jail incarceration for the probation population using datasets for jail bookings in the county from 2015 to 2020 and petitions-to-revoke (PTRs) for people on probation from 2016 to 2020. In addition to describing overall trends in jail bookings and PTRs, this brief analyzes average lengths of stay in jail for the probation population, as well as racial and ethnic disparities in these data.

Read More
[From Our Partners] Population Review Teams: Evaluating Jail Reduction and Racial Disparities Across Three Jurisdictions
Carla Sinclair Carla Sinclair

[From Our Partners] Population Review Teams: Evaluating Jail Reduction and Racial Disparities Across Three Jurisdictions

Currently implemented in more than a dozen cities around the country, jail Population Review Teams (PRTs) are one strategy to reduce jail populations. Funded by the SJC and with guidance from ISLG, the Center for Court Innovation conducted a quantitative research study of the PRT model and its impacts in three sites through the spring of 2020: Lucas County, Ohio; Pima County, Arizona; and St. Louis County, Missouri.

Read More
[From Our Partners] An Evaluation of the Osborne Association’s Harlem FamilyWorks Program: Services Supporting Families Impacted by Incarceration
Carla Sinclair Carla Sinclair

[From Our Partners] An Evaluation of the Osborne Association’s Harlem FamilyWorks Program: Services Supporting Families Impacted by Incarceration

Broadly, the evaluation aimed to document HFW’s implementation and identify its strengths, barriers to success, and best practices. The objectives for the evaluation were to document program operations, describe stakeholders’ and participants’ perspectives of the program, understand the characteristics of participants the program served, and develop recommendations for strengthening the program.

Read More